Proposed scheme, with due respect to the Military Contribution
It only remains for them to state that, subject to the above remarks
Estimates in the revised form in which they were submitted by the Governor in his despatch of 11 Sept last, as well as of the Ordinance No. 14 of 1867
They also consent to the expenditure of $7500, authorised by the Governor on account of damage caused by the Typhoon
Lee draft & Governor
Sie & Ryer
Strathall for Consideration
Jam. Sin
48 per 5 years due, on Jan 1865, Jan 1869
309 $1,157,500
94,200 209,700 the above sum = 1/2 of $t = 41,956 251,650 what is nearly the requisite amount
But I can scarcely imagine that this is really so
in private
That the Necessary remarks to explain are made with these Estimates
the result agrees with the equation
In the draft
Your Obedient Servant, hoop loud Hunt
The draft is being sent, but I do not think it is correct
subject to being in it, the Treasury has assumed the necessary amount to bring it right
for Whelan item. Altogether some strange mistakes have been made
due to the fact that
I case this proposal to pay 4 per cent per annum for 5 years on the total sum
it seems to me that the Treasury propose to make it a loan
which may be under redemption at the rate (after 1860) of $50,000 per annum
in account for the difference (viz $40,500) between $209,700 principal sum of $209,700 and $250,000 principal plus interest
76 and the difficulty
Page 48
...
Page information is kept as is.
Here is the revised HTML output with proper paragraph handling and minor adjustments for spacing and readability:Proposed scheme, with due respect to the Military Contribution
It only remains for them to state that, subject to the above remarks
Estimates in the revised form in which they were submitted by the Governor in his despatch of 11 Sept last, as well as of the Ordinance No. 14 of 1867
They also consent to the expenditure of $7500, authorised by the Governor on account of damage caused by the Typhoon
Lee draft & Governor
Sie & Ryer
Strathall for Consideration
Jam. Sin
48 per 5 years due, on Jan 1865, Jan 1869
309 $1,157,500
94,200 209,700 the above sum = 1/2 of $t = 41,956 251,650 what is nearly the requisite amount
But I can scarcely imagine that this is really so in private
That the Necessary remarks to explain are made with these Estimates, the result agrees with the equation
In the draft
Your Obedient Servant, hoop loud Hunt
The draft is being sent, but I do not think it is correct, subject to being in it, the Treasury has assumed the necessary amount to bring it right
for Whelan item. Altogether some strange mistakes have been made due to the fact that I case this proposal to pay 4 per cent per annum for 5 years on the total sum
it seems to me that the Treasury propose to make it a loan which may be under redemption at the rate (after 1860) of $50,000 per annum
in account for the difference (viz $40,500) between $209,700 principal sum of $209,700 and $250,000 principal plus interest
76 and the difficulty
سلام
proposed schicone, with then fah due respect de the Militer Contribution
It only remains for them to state that, infject to the above leuks
Estimates in the remed
cyymove of the form in which they were submittedly the "Governor in his desperated of 11 Septs lact, Has well as of the ordinance Nr. 14 of 1867
ins for
for a
as it
agrees
They also consent to the expenditure
1/4 of t$ 7500, anthurized by the Goveran on account of damage cancel by the
Typhwor
Lee draft & foverer
Sie & Ryer
Strathul for
Consideration
Jam. Sin
thus
48 pr 5 years
due, on
den
On
Jon 1865. fan 1869.
309
1157500
94,200 209,700
the aboor som
= 1⁄2 of st =
41,956 251650
what in neach the reperect amout But I can staus imagem that this
is really A.
in private
Thate the Nessay
arked to explain?
20/20
90
with these Estimates.
the result
agre
quation.
In the draft
Your Oberent Sewwant,
hoop lourd Hunt
Ith deaft is bemust, but and
in it, tabject to thing
han assumed the Measy to
bright. B I do not thinke
مدان
for Whelan item. Alt ach
26
some strange mis Cater hon.
to the fact that
I case this prom
other!
of
pay 4 per cent per annum for 5 years on the tota it seems tom that the Treasy propon to make it colp.
Merk I meet be under
re without regard
the sum in in poup of reduction at the rate (afte (860) of 50,000 per annum.
in
account for the differson (viz $40, 500) Istween $209, 700 punisher
Jum of $209,700
the difficult,
76
and $250,000 plouncefal
plus interest.
Neman
Hem
Com Than
(alatali)
R
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.